SCHLOCK
Presented by UNINVITED
GUESTS
The Nuffield, University
of Lancaster, Bailrigg, Lancaster
Thursday 3 February 2005
Hospital. Heartbeat. A Perspex-panel perspective. Indoors
and outside. Home. Anywhere. Nowhere. In your mind? Out of it?.
Three men, one woman, a hospital trolley, a sound-deck/
medication cabinet.
Heinz Tomato Ketchup (later).
"There was this accident narrative, and …'
Deadpan, not a clench, tear or sob. Bar-room or playground anecdotage.
Pause.
"Excuse me. It's better now. Thank you.'
"The blooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood …'
| This 100-minute exposition on death, pain,
trauma and injury was intended to evoke responses to these issues
from the individual, and perhaps collective, members of the audience.
Schlock was conceived and delivered as a written
and acted text with added sound, and we were taken through meticulously-portrayed
incidents and aspects of horror, death, accident and so on. |
Planespotters. Helicopter blades. The neighbourhood
Jack Russell. "Try not to remember – I love you.'
A bandaged head. Degredation. Gore-fest. Mind going,
going, gone. The devils within, without.
Laughs.
Anodyne. No catharsis, just …
"A warm, hot, sunny day …..
Done. Discuss. Depart.
The
performance was followed by a brief ‘questions and answers'
with some general discussion. Most of the audience returned
to the theatre, along with the now clean and dry cast, and the
session was chaired by Dr
Andrew Quick of the University's Theatre
Studies Department.
Some interesting issues came up, starting with
Schlock's sources, explained by the cast
as including horror films, personal narratives taken from a
selection of one-to-one interviews. Whilst the piece can perhaps
best be described as ‘experimental theatre', the
cast's description of the piece's evolution and
rehearsal phases, with improvisation, exploration of particular
emphases of the ‘text' etc, were common to most
forms of theatre.
Several present discussed the piece's musical
structure and ‘theme and variations' form, and some
had clearly saw, heard and felt a musical aspect to the performance.
Attention to dynamics, pace, acoustic quality, the controlled
rise and fall of tension was clearly identifiable in the production.
The references to and the presence of comedy were
also mentioned. When asked how comedy can impact on or relate
to pain or trauma, one suggestion was to "See more
horror movies'. There is also sometimes a lightness,
a ridiculousness in pain, as anyone falling over in an undignified
manner can vouch.
One contribution likened Schlock
to a "Cataclysm of accidents' as shown
in JG Ballard'sfilm, Crash. Another asked
"Did you know how beautiful it was', citing
a parallel with the paintings of Francis Bacon.
|
Perhaps
more pertinently to wider political and social issues of the
day, there was also some debate about ‘are we desensitised
to pain, injury, disaster?' Tsunami-fatigue and other
mollifications of continuing tragedy (the civil wars in Northern
Ireland, Sudan, parts of Africa, global famine and starvation)
are examples of how society's and individuals' views
change over time. The piece opened up far too many issues to
address in some half hour or so.
But this production, one of the best pieces of
experimental theatre I have seen, was a complex, well-thought
out and finely-produced achievement. I am looking forward to
Uninvited Guests' next work.
|
An email.
Dear Uninvited Guests
I have not long got home from seeing Schlock at The Nuffield Theatre
here in Lancaster, and was hugely impressed. It was a very thoughtful
and thought-provoking piece, created with great thought and attention
to detail, which vividly and memorably explored aspects of pain, suffering
and so on.
This had an especial effect on me as I was badly injured
in a mugging exactly seven years ago - to the week. That opportunistic
assault left me a paltry £15 lighter, and with a severely damaged
left eye which necessitated a lens implant and other surgery, and
I am still on daily medication for it. I have since been diagnosed
with post-traumatic stress disorder, and am no longer able to do paid
or formal work - largely because of that one incident.
Yet I was not personally offended, upset, hurt or traumatised
by this production. Far from it. The performance was actually a therapeutic
experience, one of many I have had which positively help me to come
to terms with my injury and the effects it has had on me. For that,
my grateful thanks to all.
Best wishes to all, and thanks for an inspiring and
affirmative show …
ENDS
Copyright © 6 February 2005 Michael Nunn