![]() |
| reviews > LUTG > FRANKENSTEIN: THE RE_CREATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FRANKENSTEIN: THE RE-CREATION Lancaster
University Theatre Group Dramatic writing and sensitive performance of a high order New writing and a powerful theatrical experience To begin, Slater & Mills' text is worthy of comment, simply because it is a highly accomplished piece of writing. They take key and choice elements of Mary Shelley's complex and dramatic plot of 1818 to render a faithful account of the doomed hero, the young Victor Frankenstein. Victor doesn't get on with his father and the reactionary, bourgeois trappings of the parental home. He goes to university, doesn't get on with his tutor, and goes ahead to plough his own furrow. A familiar tale told with care and detail So, on our hero goes to Ingolstadt, where his intellectual and social precocity grow apace, but into a doomed arrogance. This culminates in his Promethean creation, assisted by the Burke-and-Hare activities of his ‘manservant' Igor, as Victor's brainchild ‘creature' slowly trembles into life and the first act reaches its dramatic end. As we sip our interval drinks, we know that, for Victor and everyone else associated with him, nothing can be the same again. Ever. Something of monumental import has, we feel, irrevocably, happened. A horrifying destiny As the doomed trio of Victor, Elizabeth and the Creature are unable to resolve their loves, futures and fallibilities, nemesis – or the divine judgement – descends tragically on them all. In particular, Elizabeth meets a powerfully and movingly-staged end (I thought that only happened to rabbits – a masterly visual device that was excruciatingly audible too). So what, you say – that's all in the story, and has all been done before in the innumerable takes on the tale, most of which are facile, sanitised, dated and implausible snippets of the multi-layered original epic narrative. Slater & Mills have skilfully selected the kernels of the familiar, yet at the same time preserved and re-created the detailed development of the story, and laced the whole with elegant and sparkling dialogue (‘don't scowl!) and real, moving touches of human passion. Careful comedic contrasts Slater & Mills' version of the familiar tale is so also very powerful because of the extraordinary competence and inventiveness of the writing. Never over-writing or wasting a single word or gesture, their soundly-constructed plot has good shifts of tension, fine dialogue and – so difficult to write well – a keenly-developed, continuing feel of suspense. And on the stage - the acid test - it works so much better dramatically than many other professionally-written takes on the ‘classics' I have seen. A fine performance David de Konig (Frankenstein), Courtney Ryan (Elizabeth) and relative newcomer (another one – where do they find them all?) Jamie Snetsinger (The Creature) all delivered their leading roles with integrity and careful passion. But another critic reviewing this production felt that Igor (Brad Cassidy) stole the show. In the play's wider dramatic impact, nothing could be further from the truth. His portrayal of the deformed ‘manservant' was a paradigm of controlled lunacy (LUTG is good at that – think Anarchist and Wyrd Sisters), and he, like everyone and everything else about the performance, never succumbed to the temptation of farce or gave in to travesty. Brave new world? But in all that, and despite the familiarity of the story, a sense of immediate relevance in our nuke-infested, GM-manipulated planet of today, a sense of a terrifying imminent disaster of unimaginable scale, was never far away. A literary, dramatic and visual triumph. Copyright © 3 March 2005 Michael Nunn |
![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|